[Mono-list] Is Mono ready?

Aaron Bawcom aaron_bawcom@intrusion.com
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:14:00 -0500


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C48F9F.7025F473
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've been following Mono for over a year now. I was very pleased to hear
of the 1.0 release.

=20

We provide a network security device and we have been thinking of moving
our embedded Web based interface as well as other software
infrastructure over to Mono.

=20

There are certain parts of the organization that believe that using Mono
introduces too much risk. I wanted to find out from the members of the
list itself your thoughts on the stability, robustness, feature set, and
extensibility of the platform for use in an embedded appliance.

=20

Is there support for 64 bit platforms such as AMD?


------_=_NextPart_001_01C48F9F.7025F473
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:Arial;
	color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>I&#8217;ve been following Mono for over a year now. I =
was
very pleased to hear of the 1.0 release.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>We provide a network security device and we have been
thinking of moving our embedded Web based interface as well as other =
software infrastructure
over to Mono.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>There are certain parts of the organization that =
believe that
using Mono introduces too much risk. I wanted to find out from the =
members of
the list itself your thoughts on the stability, robustness, feature set, =
and
extensibility of the platform for use in an embedded =
appliance.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Is there support for 64 bit platforms such as =
AMD?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C48F9F.7025F473--