[Mono-list] Mono Packages split.

[Duncan Mak]

On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 19:45, Todd Berman wrote:
> 
> Why isnt is possible to create a 'mono' and 'mono-devel' package that is
> basically a stub that deps on what would go in those. That way you get
> the best of both worlds.
> 

We already have something similar, we have mono-complete and
mono-complete-devel. The problem is that, removing mono-complete does
not remove the packages that it depends on, as it is simply an empty
(meta) package.

Duncan.