[Mono-list] Thread Abort Behavior

[ggb]

Hi,

	I've view a different behavior with thread aborting between
Microsoft and Mono .NET implementations.

Sample:

Void ThreadProc()
{
	try
	{
		//XXXXX
	}
	catch(ThreadAbortException e)
	{
	}
	//YYYYYYY      
}

//YYYYYY code is executed with Mono but not with Microsoft after thread
is aborted.

I'm using Microsoft .NET 1.1 and Mono 0.28 versions.


G.

	

-----Mensaje original-----
De: mono-list-admin@lists.ximian.com
[mailto:mono-list-admin@lists.ximian.com] En nombre de Miguel de Icaza
Enviado el: martes, 14 de octubre de 2003 20:25
Para: Asier Llano Palacios
CC: mono-list@lists.ximian.com
Asunto: RE: [Mono-list] Binaries naming

Hello,

> Mono and pnet will still block each other, but at least Mono will have
a
> consistent naming and easy for newbie people.
> 
> I really don't mind that mono blocks pnet because I'm planning to use
only
> Mono, but as a Linux user I would prefer to have open alternatives.
That's
> why I love Linux, because the possibility of choosing. 

That is a packaging issue though.  The same happens with mail for
example, /usr/lib/sendmail has been hardcoded in every application, and
distributions still work around this problem without a hitch.

Miguel
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list