[Mono-list] Threading + Exception Handling (2 Questions)
Jonathan Pryor
jonpryor@vt.edu
20 Mar 2003 09:47:09 -0500
--=-z3WDgyELhBczgjoKeVBL
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Oops. Forgot to attach the UnhandledException sample.
- Jon
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 09:45, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> It sounds like you want to have an exception generated in one thread
> appear in another. I don't think that's possible. Exceptions are
> relative to the thread they're generated from, and deal exclusively with
> the thread of that stack.
>
> However, there is a workaround, if I'm understanding you correctly. You
> could hook up the AppDomain.UnhandledException event to your first
> thread, which would let you know if an exception was thrown from some
> thread in your application and not caught.
>
> In theory, you could use the UnhandledExceptionEventArgs information to
> determine the type of the thrown exception, to ensure that you're
> trapping the right errors. Alas, this information appears to be null
> for my build of mono (see attached sample program), but that might be
> fixed by now. Anyone else know for sure?
>
> Regardless, your UnhandledException handler can set a variable which the
> main thread checks. If the variable is set, the main thread would throw
> an exception, simulating the appearance of the thread moving from one
> thread to another.
>
> As for Thread.Abort, it should work as you expect. Thread.Abort
> generates an exception in the specified thread, not the calling thread
> (unless they're the same), and that exception will have no effect on the
> calling thread. So Thread.Abort followed by a throw should work.
>
> There is one problem, though. Thread.Abort isn't implemented for mono
> under Windows (it's a pthread under Windows problem; check the
> archives), so this may not be an acceptable solution for you.
>
> - Jon
>
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 08:51, Timothy Parez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have class which creates another thread
> > now that other tread can throw a custom error, but
> > when this error is thrown I want the main thread of the class library
> > to receive this exception so that the client application which uses my
> > library get's this error and all execution of other code in my class
> > library is stopped.
> >
> > //Code executed by the main thread:
> > protected byte[] Query(byte[] sendData)
> > {
> > //Set all values
> > data = sendData;
> >
> > queryThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(ExecuteQuery));
> >
> > //Start the query
> > queryThread.Start();
> >
> > //Wait for the query to exit
> > if (!queryThread.Join(timeout * 1000))
> > {
> > queryThread.Abort();
> > throw new Exceptions.QueryTimeoutException("Query Timeout: " +
> > timeout.ToString() + " seconds");
> > }
> >
> > //Return the response, which is now saved in the local variable
> > return queryResponse;
> > }
> >
> > // Code executed by the queryThread
> > private void ExecuteQuery()
> > {
> > UdpClient client = new UdpClient();
> > //Connect to the server and send the query data
> > try
> > {
> > client.Connect(ip,port);
> > client.Send(data,data.Length);
> > }
> > catch (Exception e)
> > {
> > client.Close();
> > throw new Exceptions.InvalidHostException("Unknown host: " +
> > ip,e);
> > }
> >
> > //Listen for a response - This is the client side
> > IPEndPoint serverIPEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(IPAddress.Any,0);
> >
> > //Receive the response
> > try
> > {
> > queryResponse = client.Receive(ref serverIPEndPoint);
> > }
> > catch (Exception e)
> > {
> > throw new Exceptions.ConnectionRefusedException("The connection
> > was refused by the remote host: " + ip + ":" + port.ToString(),e);
> > }
> > finally
> > {
> > client.Close();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > As you can see the ExecuteQuery() function can throw the
> > Exceptions.ConnectionRefusedException,
> > but my main thread never receives this error, so the execution of the
> > code in the main thread does not stop.
> > How can I fix this.
> >
> > I also have a second question:
> > queryThread.Abort();
> > throw new Exceptions.QueryTimeoutException("Query Timeout: " +
> > timeout.ToString() + " seconds");
> > I abort the second thread, will the QueryTimeoutException still be
> > thrown ? (I hope so), or will the .Abort() cause an error
> > which will prevent from the QueryTimeoutException ever happening, in
> > that case how do I abort the second query and still throw the
> > QueryTimeoutException ?
> >
> >
> > Thnx.
> > TP.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
--=-z3WDgyELhBczgjoKeVBL
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=threading.cs
Content-Type: text/plain; name=threading.cs; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
// What happens when a thread throws an uncaught exception?
using System;
using System.Threading;
class R {
private static void Worker () {
Console.WriteLine ("Worker Thread: Working...");
Thread.Sleep (500);
Console.WriteLine ("Worker Thread: Problem.");
throw new Exception ("Worker Thread Problem");
}
public static void Main () {
Thread t = new Thread (new ThreadStart (Worker));
Console.WriteLine ("Main: Starting Worker");
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException +=
new UnhandledExceptionEventHandler (OnUnhandledException);
t.Start ();
t.Join ();
Console.WriteLine ("Main: Finished");
}
private static void OnUnhandledException (object sender, UnhandledExceptionEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine ("Unhandled Exception:");
Console.WriteLine (" sender=" + sender);
Console.WriteLine (" e=" + e);
if (e != null) {
Console.WriteLine (" e: " + e);
Console.WriteLine (" Exception: " + e.ExceptionObject);
Console.WriteLine (" IsTerminating: " + e.IsTerminating);
}
else
Console.WriteLine (" ** UnhandledExceptionEventArgs is null?!");
Console.WriteLine ("Generating New Exception");
throw new Exception ("In the right thread?");
}
}
--=-z3WDgyELhBczgjoKeVBL--