[Mono-list] Interesting article @ CodeProject regarding threa d / threadpool

[Torstensson, Patrik]

Our threadpool class is not 100% optimized yet, it's just working.

Cheers,
 Patrik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Parez [mailto:tpsoftware@users.sourceforge.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:32 AM
> To: Steinar Herland
> Cc: mono-list@ximian.com
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Interesting article @ CodeProject 
> regarding thread / threadpool
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've done some tests on mono/.net performance before,
> simple calculations that is.
> 
> It seems the .net runtime can execute them almost 2 times as fast,
> but the mono runtime has a more stable run. Meaning that while the
> .net runtime had different results for the same test all the time,
> ranging around a single time, the mono runtime always had exactly the
> same time to exececute the applications.
> 
> Don't know if this helps a bit.
> 
> Timothy.
> 
> Op do 20-03-2003, om 09:19 schreef Steinar Herland:
> > http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/threadtests.asp
> > 
> > 
> > Discusses performance etc. Anyone care to tests this on Mono?
> > 
> > The article also refers to 
> > http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2002/April/MtP4MtVsMt.asp
> > Which states: The thread pool is created the first time when you
> > instantiate the ThreadPool class. It has a default limit of 
> 25 threads
> > per available processor, but that can be changed. Thus, the 
> processor is
> > never made to sit idle.
> > 
> > - What is the default value on Mono?
> > 
> > 
> > Steinar
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>