Tue, 7 Jan 2003 09:53:01 -0000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paolo Molaro" <email@example.com>
To: "Steve Newman" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "Miguel de Icaza" <email@example.com>; "Jeroen Janssen"
<firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>; <Astopford@beta.dabs.com>;
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:05 PM
> On 01/05/03 Steve Newman wrote:
> > A related note: I believe Gopal V (firstname.lastname@example.org) has just checked
> > the JANET code into Portable.Net. Since some of the next steps are
> > obvious (finish ECMAScript 3, add JScript.net support, etc.), it would
> > be a shame to see the code forked. I've never participated actively in
> Yes, forking the code at this point would be very bad.
How are Pnet intending to work around the deficiancies in their classlibs,
specifically Reflection.Emit , that is obviously needed to implement such
things as eval()?