[Mono-list] QT# or GTK# ?

Sijmen Mulder sijmen_mulder@hotmail.com
Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:58:52 +0200


I think you should use whatever you like most.
Even if one did not have a future, why wouldn't you use it? Both GTK and QT, 
on which respectively GTK# and QT# rely, both have a big userbase.
So even if GTK# or QT# would cease to exist, you can still use the last 
version right?

Only my opinion though :)
So if you ask me: use the one you like most.

--
Sijmen Mulder:

1 Linux gamer
2 .NET coder (in linux!)
3 IRC gek (ook in linux)
4 Stageloper
5 Stommesignatures-schrijver

>From: Davy Brion <davy.brion@pandora.be>
>To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com
>Subject: [Mono-list] QT# or GTK# ?
>Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:59:34 +0000
>
>Hey guys,
>
>i'd like to hear some arguments over which one is better or has the most
>promising future.  Personally i'd prefer to use QT# because i'm a KDE user,
>but if GTK# is better or has a better future, then i'd rather go with GTK#.
>
>Has anyone used them both? If so, can you please comment on the quality of
>both?  Or if you just have any comments on which one i should use, please 
>go
>ahead and list them since i just want the best one and i'd like to hear 
>from
>people who've used either one of them or preferably both.
>
>thx
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Zoeken, voor duidelijke zoekresultaten! http://search.msn.nl