[Mono-list] Winforms progress and goals.

[Christoph Wille]

SharpDevelop will be a Windows Forms application in 1.0. After that, it=20
depends on the maturity of Mono and UI libraries if we again spend time on=
=20
a porting effort (our preferred way would be someone providing a "proof of=
=20
port", which we can then merge into the current source tree).

Please read=20
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/sd-mono-port/2003-August/000507.html

Chris

At 08:11 AM 8/26/2003 +0200, Sijmen Mulder wrote:
>I'm sorry to say, but the sd-mono-list suggests that they are aiming at=20
>1.0 with windows forms. What happens after that isn't really clear.
>
>I think they should go to #wt before 1.0, but it's not me too choose...
>
>--
>Sijmen Mulder:
>
>>From: "Luis Fernandez" <luifer@onetel.net.uk>
>>To: <mono-list@ximian.com>
>>Subject: RE: [Mono-list] Winforms progress and goals.
>>Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:18:41 +0100
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>#Develop currently uses System.Windows.Forms but from what I think the aim
>>is to move it to #WT before the 1.0 release.
>>
>>Because of this, even if the SWF got to the point of been able to run the
>>current #develop release, you might not be able to do so until #WT is more
>>complete on Linux and the port to it is finished.
>>
>>Well, that was the last thing I heard form the project a while back so
>>things might have changed...
>>
>>Luis
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: mono-list-admin@lists.ximian.com
>>[mailto:mono-list-admin@lists.ximian.com]On Behalf Of Sergio Blanco
>>Cuaresma
>>Sent: 25 August 2003 19:14
>>To: Mono Winforms; mono-list@ximian.com
>>Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Winforms progress and goals.
>>
>>
>>El lun, 25-08-2003 a las 19:36, Miguel de Icaza escribi=F3:
>> >    We want to push for a particular milestone: running WebMatrix out of
>> > the box on Linux and MacOS with Mono.   This is a fairly large Winforms
>> > application that excercises plenty of areas in Winforms and the
>> > runtime.
>>
>>I know it requires a lot of work so sorry for my suggestion with no real
>>help, but it would be nice to also run SharpDevelop ;-)