[Mono-list] production quality asp.net
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 03:13:02 +0800
- In process, fewer context switches for scheduling and IO
- No need to JIT every method every time the CGI is run
- With session support
- ASP-like syntax, with code behind support
- Built-in Caching suppport
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brice Ruth" <email@example.com>
Cc: "Chris Townsend" <CTownsend@xsinc.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: 20030415 02:20
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] production quality asp.net
> Just a quick question - what are the benefits to running mod_mono v.
> just running mono in a CGI-style env?
> email@example.com wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 08:34:46AM -0400, Chris Townsend wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>First let me say WOW! ASP.NET on Linux is frikin cool. .NET on Linux is
cool; you guys rock.
> >>Is the ASP.NET portion of Mono stable enough to run a production website
on? I've been developing MS (ASP.NET) apps for a while now and would love to
switch to Mono (ASP.NET) as soon as it is even remotely production ready so I
can run all my stuff on Linux.
> >>I've been just hanging out on the list trying to figure out how I may be
able to pitch in and hoping someone else would ask this question before me.
After running the Mono hello world sample on Linux I just got SUPER excited and
had to ask.
> >It would be great if you could test all your pages in XSP and in apache
> >with mod_mono. Then, please, tell us what do you think about them.
> > Pedro