[Mono-list] SWF Programming Question
Eric Lloyd
ewlloyd@neta.com
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:38:24 -0700
Oren,
I'm in the process of developing an application in VB and C# that uses no
P/Invokes whatsoever. I haven't run into any places where it's truly
necessary. Frankly, I don't have a lot of sympathy for developers who go
under the hood and break portability for the sake of eyecandy.
What sort of P/Invokes are people using that actually provide needed
functionality? Perhaps the solution is to provide the .NET developer
community with encapsulations for the most common P/Invoke calls, so we can
restore some portability.
If they even begin to care about running on Mono (they will, soon enough),
they'll use our compatibility layer. If they need a Win32 call that we
haven't covered, they can create their own encapsulation over it and submit
it to the project. Their alternative is to cut off a significant share of
their potential market.
In the case of the toolbar, for example, somebody could write a
"Windows.Forms.SuperToolbar" object that would provide those features you
need. Publish it widely, or in a central repository, and that's one less
P/Invoke that's needed by end developers.
Cheers!
Eric
>From: "Oren Novotny" <osn@po.cwru.edu>
>To: <mono-list@ximian.com>
>Subject: RE: [Mono-list] SWF Programming Question
>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:51:50 -0400
>charset="iso-8859-7"
>
>Miguel,
>
>If P/Invoke of the Win32 functions is not supported, then I think that
>Mono's SWF implementation will be, for all intents and purposes,
>useless. I have not yet seen a single, less than trivial, .Net Windows
>application that did not use several P/Invoke's to the Win32 libraries.
>
>I'd understand not supporting P/Invoke into 3rd party libraries, since
>you'd need to translate those. But I'd think that at least the Win32
>DLL's should be supported since most applications already use them.
>
>For example, anyone who is using a toolbar or menu control, other than
>the included one, is relying on the ComCtrl32.dll library, among others.
>Since the built-in toolbar and menu controls are pretty fugly and
>feature-lacking, most people have chosen to use some other menu/toolbar
>library. Likewise, many applications make calls to set an XP Theme on
>certain controls that the .manifest trick isn't enough for.
>
>In the end, if Mono's SWF implementation doesn't take all of those
>P/Invoke's into account, then I don't think that many people will be
>able to use it since their apps have external dependencies.
>
>I hope that you reconsider.
>
>Regards,
>
>--Oren