[Mono-list] Platforms Mono will support?

[Martin Imrisek]

I've been lurking on this list for only a short time so please excuse me 
if I've missed some of the conversation details - I'm slowly going through 
the list archives.

I have to agree with the sentiment below that porting Mono to different 
architectures should have hight priority - which brings me to ask about 
the state of the SPARC port.  I've noticed that it's listed as being in 
progress and that there are a couple of sparc files in mono/arch/sparc/.
What's the status of the port and what is the roadmap for the port?

I've got a sparc machine just itching to be used and I'd like to help with 
this effort if possible.

Regards,

Martin


On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, G.Kumaraguru wrote:

> 
> 
>  Runtime support for VB.NET would be a great thing.
>  But compiler for VB.NET sounds like an invitation for MS lawyers.
>  Thankfully, no such confusion for C# and ECMAscript(BTW What happened
> to http://janet-js.sourceforge.net/ ? )
> 
>  If MonoCLI is to get widespread usage, priority must be given to port
> it to different architecture.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: debackerl@etive.com
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 10:27 PM
> To: mono-list@ximian.com
> Subject: RE: [Mono-list] Platforms Mono will support?
> 
> 
> > I don't know if there're risks making the compiler, howevr there're
> > No risks making the run-times. Why should they modify the syntax? VB6 
> > programmers are already so confused, I don't think they'll do that.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> 

-- 
--
-----------------
Martin Imrisek       
mimrisek@rogers.com