[Mono-list] patents on ISO/ECMA C#
Yannick Koehler
yannick.koehler@colubris.com
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:13:58 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le October 18, 2002 01:22 am, Matt Liotta a écrit: / On October 18, 2002
01:22 am, Matt Liotta wrote:
> From my interview with David Stutz of Microsoft
> (http://www.devx.com/free/hotlinks/2002/ednote061902/ednote061902-1.asp)
> ...
>
> Q. On which parts of the ECMA specification does Microsoft hold patents?
> What are Microsoft's plans for enforcement of these patents?
>
> Microsoft's Stutz:
> I am certainly not the right person to ask on this question, and even if
> I were, I would be unlikely to be able to answer, since the Microsoft
> patent portfolio is large and constantly changing, and many patents
> aren't granted for years after they are submitted.
>
> It is important to point out that the reason that Microsoft participated
> in creating ECMA 334 and 335 is precisely so that others will be able to
> create their own commercial CLI implementations. Microsoft is very
> interested in seeing many CLI implementations succeed. To this end,
> Microsoft has said (for literally years now) that implementers of the
> spec will have royalty-free access to Microsoft intellectual property
> that might otherwise stand in the way of their implementing these
> standards.
The bad part is "is precisely so that others will be able to
> create their own commercial CLI implementations.". The word commercial here
is probably meaning non-GPL type of license even if you were going to release
a GPL Commercial version they would probably refuse to let you have the
rights to their patents... Why not send a request to Microsoft for that
royalty free patent ;-)
- --
Yannick Koehler
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9sCU2fuKOJNEyL1URAobPAJ4uZ23X2CaWlVsrDm6fYhZqK/VpQQCeMFUu
ieufyxFBFpnIHO4IonxfPJA=
=oMVZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----