[Mono-list] The viral license problem (was System.CodeDom.Compiler licensing issues)
James Michael DuPont
mdupont777@yahoo.com
Thu, 23 May 2002 23:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, James Michael DuPont wrote:
>
> > They also dont want applications like gcc to be
> > released as shared dlls that can used in a library
> > form.
>
--- Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@math.toronto.edu> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't want the gcc to stop being GPL. I *want*
> the software that I
> use to be GPL. I find assurance in knowing that the
> sofware that I use
> will remain publicly available and no one will be
> able to "take over" that
> software (the case of Kerberos is an example of what
> I mean).
>
> The fact that that the GPL ensures that software
> remains available is
> crucial. It encourages innovation and the sharing
> of ideas. Linux would
> not have become what it is without the GPL.
Ok, now how would you implement the full
CodeDOMProviderClass (with parsing and error checking)
for c/c++/fortran/ada?
You would re-write the parsers in C# under x11, good
luck.
No, You would use the gcc to do the parsing for you?
Well it is gpled. Users could not use a GCC
CodeDOMProvider without their programs being GPLed.
miike
=====
James Michael DuPont
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com