[Mono-list] Need feedback on NUnit testcase

[Brad Wilson]

Miguel de Icaza wrote:

> Ideally, yes.  The idea is to make sure that our implementation does
> what it advertises it does.  Sometimes a change on the code will have
> side effects, and this will help catch those side effects right away,
> rather than a few weeks or months down the line when it will be harder
> to debug.

+1. I think "Unit testing for compliance" is a whole different thing from
the typical "unit testing for catching the majority of bugs".

Brad

--
Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/dotnetguy/