Hi Daniel,
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 01:49, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> If you replace the 2nd and 3rd statement by:
>
> private double Real;
> private double Imaginary; // Notice I dropped "=0"
>
> The program compiles perfectly.
This is really strange - are you talking about the compiling bit or the
bit where you try to run it using Mono ? I would be severely shocked to
discover that the compiler doesn't support initialization of double
fields so I have to fix that right away if it really is true :-)
If this fixes the tree match error, well Lupus/Dietmar will take care
of it ;-)
Regards,
Ravi
--
"If you're smart, you'll be humble. There always is somebody
who hasn't read a book and knows twice as much as you do."
-- David Duchovny in Readers' Digest
Ravi Pratap M <ravi@ximian.com>
<http://primates.ximian.com/~ravi>