[Mono-list] mcs compiles on linux. Now what?

Paolo Molaro lupus@ximian.com
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:51:18 +0100

On 03/08/02 Mark Lewis wrote:
> It's not that String.GetHashCode() itself is slow, it's that hashtable
> overhead is slow because of poor hashing, due to the current hashcode
> implementation.  But I don't see any hashtable calls in your profile report,
> so maybe it's still not a big deal?

The numbers are cumulative, as I don't track the call graph, but I can say
that the total time spent in Hashtable::Find is now 4% and is_keyword()
takes < 1 %, so that's not the problem.


lupus@debian.org                                     debian/rules
lupus@ximian.com                             Monkeys do it better