[Mono-list] .NET version 1.1 and 2.0

Brad Wilson dotnetguy@pobox.com
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:26:06 -0600

Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:

> Sorry, but (despite their ugly names) aren't OleDb.... classes just the
> abstraction we want?

Yes, indeed. They are "abstracted" in the sense that they can be used to
talk to any database with a suitable driver. The connection string is how
you choose the driver, and it's trivial to keep that string outside the
application code (obviously).


Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/dotnetguy/