[Mono-list] [Fwd: [Mono-cvs-list] Mono CVS: mcs gonzalo]
Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 16:29:08 +0200
* [ Dick Porter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:24:44 +0200 ]
> > "The current position of the StreamReader is not changed by Peek. The
> > returned value is -1 if no more characters are currently available."
> > The behavior under remarks is the one i noticed, cause i run the same
> > code under MS (wrapping a NetworkStream in a StreamReader) with no
> > problem.
> Those two statements are not mutually exclusive. They say:
Oh, may be i should have quoted only the second phrase, which was the
one i wanted to point out, cause it does not mention anything about seek
Btw, mkestner already provided a solution for the problem that was
fixing ReadLine not to use Peek. Thanks.
Btw2: yesterday i proved that Peek does not call CanSeek. So our current
Peek implementation won't let me peek a char if the underlying stream is
a NetworkStream, while MS impl. let me do it.
We don't need to check for seek capabilities cause we don't need them.
We only need to read 1 more char and keep it buffered for the next Read.
Does that require any seek?
Gonzalo Paniagua Javier <email@example.com>