[Mono-list] Missing Types from corlib

[Serge]

Maybe it's just me, but I think that such amount of attributes will quickly
made the code unreadable.
Remember, we practically decided not to use in-line XML comments to prevent
intermixing the code with extra verbose info.
But practically almost all modern editors allow folding of comment blocks
(even vim has it now ;-) while for one-line attributes it's useless.

Sergey


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Drochak" <ndrochak@gol.com>
To: "'Miguel de Icaza'" <miguel@ximian.com>
Cc: <mono-list@ximian.com>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Mono-list] Missing Types from corlib


> > The idea would be to use it like this:
> >
> > [MonoAuthor ("Guarav")]
> > class MyClass {
> > [MonoTODO]
> > void printf ()
> > {
> > throw new exception ("unimplemented");
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> I was thinking of something just a bit more, like:
>
>  [MonoMaintainer ("Miguel", "miguel@ximian.com")]
>  [MonoAuthor ("Guarav")]
>  class MyClass {
>   [MonoTODO("Make it do something")]
>   void printf ()
>   {
>   throw new exception ("unimplemented");
>   }
>  }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>