[Mono-list] wishlist
Rein Petersen
rmpetersen@cng.ca
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:37:38 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C2B032.874ED8A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've only dreamed of using *nix in my web farm application but I have a =
few needs to to contend with before I could. For one, a data provider =
that mimics SQLXML managed classes would be a huge advantage. Microsoft =
built their SQLXML managed classes using TDS and I believe I know =
approximately how they have done it. Secondly, I'd need the ability to =
write modules and handlers (and register them in web.config's would be =
nice). Also, a couple of shortcomings MS has would be nice to overcome: =
for example, impersonation is great but it the impersonated user =
requires all the permissions to allow the dynamic compilation of the =
code. This is a security risk and makes the use of impersonation =
unfeasible in many ways. It would be nicer if a section of code could be =
run in context of the logged (or specifed) user and the rest of the =
code, including the compilation, runs as the normal ASPNET system user. =
Or, maybe it would make more sense to specify which user account context =
is used when complilation is performed...
Rein
------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C2B032.874ED8A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2722.900" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've only dreamed of using *nix in my =
web farm=20
application but I have a few needs to to contend with before I could. =
For one, a=20
data provider that mimics SQLXML managed classes would be a huge =
advantage.=20
Microsoft built their SQLXML managed classes using TDS and I believe I =
know=20
approximately how they have done it. Secondly, I'd need the ability to =
write=20
modules and handlers (and register them in web.config's would be nice). =
Also, a=20
couple of shortcomings MS has would be nice to overcome: for example,=20
impersonation is great but it the impersonated user requires all the =
permissions=20
to allow the dynamic compilation of the code. This is a security risk =
and makes=20
the use of impersonation unfeasible in many ways. It would be nicer if a =
section=20
of code could be run in context of the logged (or specifed) user and the =
rest of=20
the code, including the compilation, runs as the normal ASPNET system =
user. Or,=20
maybe it would make more sense to specify which user account context is =
used=20
when complilation is performed...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rein</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C2B032.874ED8A0--