[Mono-list] Patches for TraceSwitch
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:52:27 -0800
Thanks. That's great news. I just signed up for the list on Thursday and have only looked at committed code. So long as it works well (read: like the Microsoft Framework), I don't really care who's code it is. :) You can pretend I didn't send the patch in.
From: Jonathan Pryor [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Fri 12/20/2002 8:08 PM
To: JD Conley
Cc: Mono List
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Patches for TraceSwitch
Guess you haven't been reading the list lately... ;-)
I re-wrote a good portion of the Switch handling and related code
(including the all-important DiagnosticsConfigurationHandler, which
actually reads the .config file). This was committed to CVS and
announced to Mono-List on Wednesday (see message titled "Got
Switches?"), so it's a rather recent addition.
Good news: it works (for my tests, anyway).
Bad news: your diff doesn't have a chance of applying properly, as most
of TraceSwitch has changed. Such is life.
I just committed unit tests for TraceSwitch, but there will be problems
with actually *running* the unit tests until somebody can tell me how to
deal with .config files from within NUnit. See the (going nowhere)
thread "Testing .config files".
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 22:50, JD Conley wrote:
> I was in the process of making our enhanced trace package function with Mono and I ran into TraceSwitch. I don't think it was ever finished. Included is a functioning TraceSwitch class which is used to determine if the trace level you're testing is greater/equal to the level of the Switch. This is used to determine if our TraceQueue should send the trace items onto the listeners. I didn't see any Unit Tests for TraceSwitch and it doesn't look like anybody really uses it. But we do. :)
> JD Conley
> Winfessor, Inc
> "Life would be so much easier if we could just see the source code."
Mono-list maillist - Monoemail@example.com