[Mono-list] NAnt vs make

[Jeroen Janssen]

Nick Drochak wrote:
> | These should all help you to see why NAnt might be a better option:
> |
> | http://draconet.sourceforge.net/
> 
> Ooooh.  This is cool.

Is this kind of like Mozilla's TinderBox?

> | Running a continuous integration system using a system like
> | Draco.NET (built on NAnt/NDoc/NUnit) or even NAnt BuildServer is a one way of ensuring that
> | code quality is consistently high and that potential problem are
> | detected as
> | quickly as possible. You can configure the system to build/test/check code
> | even as they are committed to your source control system.
> 
> Yep.  We want that.  Especially if it can run on both windows and *nix.
> 
> Assuming we get someone to configure it, is there a server to use for
> something like this?

I still need to have a look at the documentation, but it would be very 
interesting to have this kind of thing setup for Mono.

I will be moving to my own appartement during Christmas and I have a 
'spare' machine I want to put debian on, so it might be possible to see 
if I can get it working (not sure if Draco.NET runs under mono yet).

If we have several machines (both windows & linux) it would be nice to 
have central 'site' that contains a summary of build status (something 
like http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=SeaMonkey ). Any 
ideas?
---
Jeroen Janssen