[Mono-list] Might Have Found A Way To Get GCC .NET !

James Michael DuPont mdupont777@yahoo.com
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT)

> things like mc++ as an option)and we should stick with the GCJ and
> Jilc 
> things this is just an idea though and any ideas, suggestions,
> assistance, 
> etc., would be welcome and i would be thrilled if i was wrong about
> lack of 
> docs on GCJ but i don't think i am cause the GNU message boards even 
> admitted to lack of docs on gjc internals.

I am interested in the GCC because it is so well supported.
Secondly the lack of documentation is a large problem with the gcc, but
people are working on it. One of the motivations for the introspector
project was to help document this structure.

I must admit that my docs are much worse than anything the gcc team has

One of the things that I was looking into was a abstract sytax tree
level two-way translation between the gcc and other compilers,
specifically the cscc compiler.

The idea was to use a simple perl scripting language to do the mapping
between the two... I have paused this to get into many debates about
the legal and moral issues involved, and many people are not happy
about the idea.....

If you go the GCC-GJC compiler path then I will try and help...


James Michael DuPont

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes