[Mono-list] ADO.NET

A Rafael D Teixeira rafaelteixeirabr@hotmail.com
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:33:43 -0200


ADO.NET has two subtrees, one uses a specialized DataAdapter for SqlServer, 
the other uses OLEDB, and can be used with specific OLEDB provider or go 
thru ODBC to use any ODBC driver. I think our first implementation can be a 
OLEDB-bridge to Linux-ODBC drivers and after it many people can contribute 
managed OLEDB providers or specialized DataAdapter.

The SQLServer DataAdapter exists because:

1 - With less layers performance is a bit better
2 - As XML is the basis for ADO.NET dataset, this adapter can leverage the 
XML support that SQL Server 2000 provides. That leads to a lot more 
performance for hierarchical data (and believe me, most of my Business 
Objects are deeply hierarchical).

Rafael Teixeira
Brazilian Developer



>From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
>To: Rob Cecil <rob@ruthsx.com>
>CC: mono-list@ximian.com
>Subject: Re: [Mono-list] ADO.NET
>Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:07:33 -0500
>
>
>AFAIK there isn't an ADO equivalent yet. Has anyone started thinking
>about it? I'm happy to contribute thoughts (and hopefully even code).
>Certainly, though, it shouldn't be based on a specific RDBMS.
>
>-Ben
>
>Rob Cecil wrote:
>
>>Sorry if I missed this on the faq - is there an equivalent of ADO.NET,
>>and if so what is called and what underlying technology is it based
>>upon (e.g. Berkeley DB).
>>
>>Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com
>>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp