[Mono-list] Re: Mono CVS: mcs gvaish

[Miguel de Icaza]

Further comments:

> Miguel:
> I think this should be a policy on the project, any nested namespace and any 
> classes not 'private' (even 'internal' may bring problems) that was 
> naturally going to be added to what exists in ECMA/MS System namespace must 
> be in truth rooted on Mono namespace. What do you think?

I dont think there is any problem with internal classes.  If there is
ever a name class with an internal class, we can always rename it
without affecting any other part of the system.

So the `Mono.' namespace rule should just apply to classes that for some
reason we have to expose to the world, but are not part of the standard
(for example, we might need a gateway to communicate say the System
assembly with our corlib implementation).

miguel.