[Mono-list] ArrayList.GetEnumerator

[Nick Drochak]

Alexander,

I agree.  

The name of the concrete class is right there in the VS.Net debugger's
local window, so I can't help but see the name :)

As you and others have suggested, I'll just make a "simple" class that
implements the interface and that'll be it for now. It'll be better than
just returning null :)

Thanks,
Nick D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Klyubin [mailto:klyubin@aqris.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 4:49 AM
> To: Nick Drochak
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] ArrayList.GetEnumerator
> 
> 
> As I see it, you should not worry about the concrete class that 
> implements IEnumerable interface. As far as contract for 
> .GetEnumerator 
> is concerned it is allowed to return any class implementing 
> IEnumerable. 
> I think you should stop looking and names of concrete 
> classes, this if 
> not the right way to go. Just implement the contract for the method 
> properly. Also, looking at methods provided by the class returned by 
> Microsoft implementation might be a violation of intellectual 
> property 
> rights...
> 
> Regards,
> Alexander Klyubin
> 
> Nick Drochak wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I found that one of my ReadOnlyCollection tests is failing 
> because we 
> > haven't implemented ArrayList.GetEnumerator() yet.
> > 
> > I thought I'd just whip that one out real quick so my test 
> would pass, 
> > but low and behold I find out MS's 
> ArrayList.GetEnumerator() returns 
> > an object of type "ArrayListEnumeratorSimple."  I can't find a 
> > reference to this class anywhere.
> > 
> > Perhaps it's just an internal (embedded?) class in the MS ArrayList 
> > class and any ol' class that implements IEnumerator will do?  Any 
> > ideas or opinions on this one?  I hate it when my test fails.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Nick D.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com 
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>