[Mono-list] JVM performance: JVM as a basis for CLR
Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
> > Sun has two JITs, one that generates slow code and
> > one that generates fast code. You need to use the
> > "-server" flag to get the fast one.
> My Sun JVM rejects the "-server" flag.
Then you should upgrade--it's out of date.
> PS My version of the C# port of convj performs at
> least 20% better than the version you supplied.
Other than the variable names, I can't see any
difference between the two versions. Can you point
to where they are different?
BTW, what I posted isn't "representative benchmarks",
it's two microbenchmarks. All they tell me is
that a JVM isn't uniformly bad compared to a CLR;
To get an overall idea of a reasonably broad range of
performance parameters, someone would need to port,
say, the Gabriel benchmarks.
So, overall, I wouldn't get hung up on these
particular two microbenchmarks.
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger