[Mono-list] JVM performance: JVM as a basis for CLR

[Kunle Odutola]

I have a URL to the test that I used when this message (below) first came
out but it currently points no where (?). PErhaps it got lost in the site
reshuffle or it has been withdrawn??.

http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0106d&L=dotnet&F=&S=&P=5300
7

In any case, it was against IBM WebSphere/Apache/Oracle if I remember
correctly. I daresay that WebLogic may have a faster J2EE stack than
WebSphere but I doubt if it will make much of a difference to J2EE
performance in relation to .NET, Oracle's embedded solution might.....

Kunle


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mono-list-admin@ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-admin@ximian.com]On
> Behalf Of Jay Freeman (saurik)
> Sent: 22 July 2001 15:40
> To: mono-list
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] JVM performance: JVM as a basis for CLR
>
>
> Kunle:
>
> Do you have a URL for that?  (All I've been able to find is an
> older version
> of the same comparison which they used to show that COM+'s speed).  I'd be
> interested to see what they used for the "J2EE" implementations.  See, to
> me, the most fair comparison to ASP.NET is JSP running on
> Jakarta, the Java
> Servlet reference implementation, both running against the same
> web server:
> IIS.  However, I don't really picture them using that in a test.  I'd be
> interested to see if they did that or went all the way to the JWS
> (Java Web
> Server) that Sun sells for their comparison, which is a 100% Java
> web server
> and isn't known for breakneck speed.
>
> If they have the actual code for the ASP.NET version available, it would
> likely be a simple port back to Jakarta.  I might do some playing with it
> next week.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jay Freeman (saurik)
> saurik@saurik.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kunle Odutola" <kunle.odutola@virgin.net>
> To: "mono-list" <mono-list@ximian.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 9:24 AM
> Subject: RE: [Mono-list] JVM performance: JVM as a basis for CLR
>
>
> > > Let me state it clearly again: I am really interested
> > > in seeing and understanding test cases where a CLR
> > > (theoretically or practically) outperforms a JVM.
> > > I'm asking out of technical interest, to understand
> > > both systems better, not to win an argument.
> > > But the existence or non-existence of
> > > such cases also should be an important data point
> > > for the choices Mono makes wrt. a CLR implementation.
> >
> > There was the .NET version of the Nile.com ASP.NET sample site
> that MS put
> > out a while ago.....it was faster than the ASP/VC++/COM and ASP/VB/COM
> > solution which were in turn faster than the various J2EE versions if I
> > remember correctly.
> >
> > Kunle
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>