[Mono-list] JVM performance: JVM as a basis for CLR
Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:44:56 +0100
I have a URL to the test that I used when this message (below) first came
out but it currently points no where (?). PErhaps it got lost in the site
reshuffle or it has been withdrawn??.
In any case, it was against IBM WebSphere/Apache/Oracle if I remember
correctly. I daresay that WebLogic may have a faster J2EE stack than
WebSphere but I doubt if it will make much of a difference to J2EE
performance in relation to .NET, Oracle's embedded solution might.....
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
> Behalf Of Jay Freeman (saurik)
> Sent: 22 July 2001 15:40
> To: mono-list
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] JVM performance: JVM as a basis for CLR
> Do you have a URL for that? (All I've been able to find is an
> older version
> of the same comparison which they used to show that COM+'s speed). I'd be
> interested to see what they used for the "J2EE" implementations. See, to
> me, the most fair comparison to ASP.NET is JSP running on
> Jakarta, the Java
> Servlet reference implementation, both running against the same
> web server:
> IIS. However, I don't really picture them using that in a test. I'd be
> interested to see if they did that or went all the way to the JWS
> (Java Web
> Server) that Sun sells for their comparison, which is a 100% Java
> web server
> and isn't known for breakneck speed.
> If they have the actual code for the ASP.NET version available, it would
> likely be a simple port back to Jakarta. I might do some playing with it
> next week.
> Jay Freeman (saurik)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kunle Odutola" <email@example.com>
> To: "mono-list" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 9:24 AM
> Subject: RE: [Mono-list] JVM performance: JVM as a basis for CLR
> > > Let me state it clearly again: I am really interested
> > > in seeing and understanding test cases where a CLR
> > > (theoretically or practically) outperforms a JVM.
> > > I'm asking out of technical interest, to understand
> > > both systems better, not to win an argument.
> > > But the existence or non-existence of
> > > such cases also should be an important data point
> > > for the choices Mono makes wrt. a CLR implementation.
> > There was the .NET version of the Nile.com ASP.NET sample site
> that MS put
> > out a while ago.....it was faster than the ASP/VC++/COM and ASP/VB/COM
> > solution which were in turn faster than the various J2EE versions if I
> > remember correctly.
> > Kunle
> Mono-list maillist - Monoemail@example.com