[Mono-list] Re: dotGNU vindictive anti-mono bias

[Martin Coxall]

> 2. I have no problem with his claim that "Mono is worth the
>    effort".  I even personally agree with that statement.
>    The problem is that his way of speaking with "we" and "they"
>    about the two projects has started creating unacceptable
>    amounts of confusion.

Confusion? Hands up here who is confused with the concept of me using "we" to 
refer to dotGNU when posting there, and "we" to refer to Mono when posting 
here? Anyone?

No, I thought not. Mr Bollow, your excuse for banning me seems lame. Maybe 
your mind is feeble enough that the word "we" causes confusion, but I don't 
think anyone else on dotGNU is that imbecilic.

You banned me because you didn't like me promoting Mono. Pure and simple.

---
Martin
---

"Where laughing and smiling are not allowed"