[Mono-list] Class Library coding standards
Patrik Torstensson
Patrik.Torstensson@framfablabs.com
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:59:43 +0200
Agree, I think the _ for non public fields is better.. ;-)
- Patrik
-----Original Message-----
From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:miguel@ximian.com]
Sent: den 19 juli 2001 02:42
To: David Menestrina
Cc: mono-list@ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Class Library coding standards
> Is there any way we could go with 4 space tabs
> instead?
> All of our code is going to be at least 3 tabs deep
> (namespace/class/function). That will take up a lot of space with 8
> space tabs.
I can see a reason for this. If you feel more confortable using 4
spaces, that is fine with me.
> As for private/protected member variables, I usually
> do m_varName. For statics, s_varName.
I do not care a lot, but I find these conventions a bit ugly.
Miguel.
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list