[Mono-list] Class Library coding standards

Patrik Torstensson Patrik.Torstensson@framfablabs.com
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:59:43 +0200

Agree, I think the _ for non public fields is better.. ;-)

- Patrik

-----Original Message-----
From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:miguel@ximian.com] 
Sent: den 19 juli 2001 02:42
To: David Menestrina
Cc: mono-list@ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Class Library coding standards

> Is there any way we could go with 4 space tabs
> instead?
> All of our code is going to be at least 3 tabs deep 
> (namespace/class/function).  That will take up a lot of space with 8 
> space tabs.

I can see a reason for this.  If you feel more confortable using 4
spaces, that is fine with me.

> As for private/protected member variables, I usually
> do m_varName.  For statics, s_varName.  

I do not care a lot, but I find these conventions a bit ugly.


Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com