[rooneg@electricjellyfish.net Re: [Mono-list] Class Library coding standards]

[Patrik Torstensson]

Thats right, I will also go with whatever the majority wants..

It's not that important *g*

- Patrik

-----Original Message-----
From: Garrett Rooney [mailto:rooneg@electricjellyfish.net] 
Sent: den 18 juli 2001 22:37
To: mono-list@ximian.com
Subject: [rooneg@electricjellyfish.net Re: [Mono-list] Class Library
coding standards]


oops, this probably should have gone to the list...

----- Forwarded message from Garrett Rooney
<rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> -----

Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 16:33:47 -0400
From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net>
To: Patrik Torstensson <Patrik.Torstensson@framfablabs.com>
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Class Library coding standards

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:31:22PM +0200, Patrik Torstensson wrote:
> It's the other way around for me ;-)
> 
> It doesn't really matter but I think the code becomes easier to read 
> and you don't have different rules for the {}.
> 
> Just my 2c..

my other problem with it (and with putting the {} on the next line in
general) is that it makes it gratuitously different from most c# code
i've seen.

but hey, i guess we'll go with whatever the majority wants...

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you
from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that
would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you
from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that
would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list