[Mono-list] any comments out there about this article
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:44:50 +0100
> I totally agree on the need for the JIT, compiler and such to be relased in
> GPL. My problem is for the class library. If a non-free software with a
> non-free license is run on top of a GPL'd mono class library, what happens?
It has to be released under a valid, GPL-compatible Free Software license.
This is why RMS had the LGPL produced: to help in these situations where the
pure GPL is not desirable.
"Where laughing and smiling are not allowed"