[Mono-list] any comments out there about this article

[Martin Coxall]

> I'm not sure Microsoft would deliberately make specification-related "IP"
> (as they call it) incompatible license-wise with the GNU licenses.
> Remember, Microsoft has three arms: Development, PR, and Legal, and them
> making the .NET ECMA-submitted stuff non-GPL-compatible would simply be an
> unmitigated PR disaster.

By submitting to the ECMA, are they not required to accept the ECMA's 
licensing terms? If so, I know for a fact they are GPL compatible.

---
Martin
---

"Where laughing and smiling are not allowed"