Ravi Pratap M
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:54:54 +0530 (IST)
On 1 Aug 2001, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Lex is really not necessary, writting tokenizers is so simple, that
> using Lex for traditional languages is sort of a waste of time, but
> that is just my impression.
I agree with you there :-) Plus, thanks to some braindead-ness in
VB, writing our own lexer makes eminent sense. That's what we learnt,
working with gb.
"If you're smart, you'll be humble. There always is somebody
who hasn't read a book and knows twice as much as you do."
-- David Duchovny in Readers' Digest
Ravi Pratap M <firstname.lastname@example.org>