[Mono-dev] Fork of certmgr - any ideas? (Mono-devel-list Digest, Vol 117, Issue 32)

[Arthur Peka]

>In the case of certmgr, was there any complexity in creating the solution
in MD?  If it's trivial, it might be reasonable for people to just
>generate them when they need them.  If it's non-trivial, it might not be
unreasonable to include those in the mono sources.

I beg to differ. There wasn't really any complexity there, but scaffolding
takes time and energy. Proper solution file could at least be generated
with make.

Arthur.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) <
edward.harvey.mono at clevertrove.com> wrote:

> > From: mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-
> > bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Jo Shields
> >
> > it's
> > easier to work with a standalone MD project than the whole Mono tree,
> > when doing breakpointing & object inspection
>
> Something I've certainly done in the past to debug mono sources, was to
> create a MD/XS solution in the mono source dir locally on my system, with a
> really basic console application that referenced some mono classes, so I
> could then debug my console app & step through mono source in the IDE.
> After doing stuff, I chose to commit mono source changes and discard the
> IDE scaffolding because it was trivial.
>
> In the case of certmgr, was there any complexity in creating the solution
> in MD?  If it's trivial, it might be reasonable for people to just generate
> them when they need them.  If it's non-trivial, it might not be
> unreasonable to include those in the mono sources.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20150124/0be2eb73/attachment-0001.html>