[Mono-dev] Regression in XmlSerializer Specified fields since PR 1257
David Curylo
curylod at asme.org
Wed Apr 1 05:04:22 UTC 2015
PR #1257 seems to be causing a new regression for me since upgrading from 3.8.0 to 3.12.1 (this PR was merged before 3.10.0). Xml serialization from SOAP responses where {V}Specified values would need to be set are no longer reliably set. The only way to get them to work reliably seems to be if I add ShouldSerialize{V} methods. It seems to go back to this commit.
https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/52cdea5c0ad5e4ee8ee218b0f90522645ec3ad8a
It seems that in some cases, the {V}Specified boolean isn’t getting set. It’s sporadic for me when this issue actually occurs, so I don’t yet have an isolated test case, but looking through the code, this logic doesn’t seem right to me:
public bool IsValueSpecifiedSettable () {
…
return ((PropertyInfo) _specifiedMember).CanWrite;
…
return ((FieldInfo) _specifiedMember).IsInitOnly;
…
}
https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/52cdea5c0ad5e4ee8ee218b0f90522645ec3ad8a#diff-3c49e354661f4bb712bf89209bbb85b4R224
If it’s a writable property we return true, but if it's a read-only field, we also return true? I think we’d want to return false if it were a read-only field and since mine (and probably everyone’s) {V}Specified fields are generated public boolean fields, then this results in a false so specified doesn’t get set. I’m guessing there is some other race going on because it is set sometimes, not others. Anyone else having issues with {V}Specified fields since this fix?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20150401/da917c9e/attachment.html>
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list