[Mono-dev] TCP 3.0.1/2

Andres G. Aragoneses knocte at gmail.com
Wed Jan 23 15:15:49 UTC 2013


Hey Rodrigo,

If you mention already the epoll backend as the place where the bug is, 
does that mean you have already a more isolated testcase than the one 
posted earlier in this thread? If yes, I might look into it, but I don't 
promise anything.

Thanks

On 21/01/13 19:27, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> Yes, it's the current suggested workaround until someone post a fix for
> the epoll backend.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Roope Kangas <roope at grandcrugames.com
> <mailto:roope at grandcrugames.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi!
>
>     Whats the status of this issue?
>
>     Is the "best" way on mono to implement a server by writing it
>     against the *Async API and then settings MONO_DISABLE_AIO=1
>
>     Seems odd?
>
>     --
>     Roope
>
>     On Dec 7, 2012, at 6:44 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera <kumpera at gmail.com
>     <mailto:kumpera at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>     By the way, did you guys tried MONO_DISABLE_AIO=1 by any chance on
>>     your tests? It solves the issue for me.
>>
>>
>>     On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Greg Young
>>     <gregoryyoung1 at gmail.com <mailto:gregoryyoung1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         We have code that shows the issue
>>         https://github.com/ysw/mono-socket-problem/tree/master/SocketTest
>>
>>         Greg
>>
>>         On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera
>>         <kumpera at gmail.com <mailto:kumpera at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Btw, I managed to find a linux bot that shows the io
>>             callback issue.
>>             The TP test works fine though.
>>
>>
>>             On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Greg Young
>>             <gregoryyoung1 at gmail.com <mailto:gregoryyoung1 at gmail.com>>
>>             wrote:
>>
>>                 Thats already been provided (though its not hard to
>>                 do). I will
>>                 reupload a test that shows beahviour.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         --
>>         Le doute n'est pas une condition agréable, mais la certitude
>>         est absurde.
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>     Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>     <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
>>     http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>




More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list