[Mono-dev] Assert in mini-arm.c

Zoltan Varga vargaz at gmail.com
Wed Aug 14 00:14:25 UTC 2013


Hi,

Can you see whats at 'code' and 'target' at frame #3, i.e.
x/10i code
x/10i target

     Zoltan


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Bassam Tabbara <bassam at symform.com> wrote:

>  Unfortunately that did not help. Still seeing the problem. I'm still
> working on a test case but I'm not having much luck so far in getting an
> isolated repro.
>
>  I was able to get a debugger attached to the process right when
> handle_thunk asserts, and there were 6 threads with the following call
> stack:
>
>  Thread 5 (Thread 0x558ff460 (LWP 9201)):
> #0  handle_thunk (method=0x0, domain=0x4ce44e58, absolute=1,
> code=0x427f8f08 "Q\364\377\353\367\377\377\352",
>     target=0x511f02a0 "\r\300\240\341\360_-\351(\320M\342k\323\377\353",
> dyn_code_mp=0x0) at mini-arm.c:3373
> #1  0x00172764 in arm_patch_general (method=0x0, domain=0x0,
> code=0x427f8f08 "Q\364\377\353\367\377\377\352",
>     target=0x511f02a0 "\r\300\240\341\360_-\351(\320M\342k\323\377\353",
> dyn_code_mp=0x0) at mini-arm.c:3425
> #2  0x00172ca8 in arm_patch (code=0x427f8f08
> "Q\364\377\353\367\377\377\352", target=0x511f02a0
> "\r\300\240\341\360_-\351(\320M\342k\323\377\353") at mini-arm.c:3536
> #3  0x001830bc in mono_arch_patch_callsite (method_start=0x427f8e90
> "\r\300\240\341\360_-\351(\320M\342", code_ptr=0x427f8f0c
> "\367\377\377\352",
>     addr=0x511f02a0 "\r\300\240\341\360_-\351(\320M\342k\323\377\353") at
> tramp-arm.c:87
> #4  0x0012c5c8 in common_call_trampoline (regs=0x558fd090, code=0x427f8f0c
> "\367\377\377\352", m=0x2a08a000, tramp=0x2e4bcd80 "x\320\217U", vt=0x0,
> vtable_slot=0x0,
>     need_rgctx_tramp=0) at mini-trampolines.c:673
> #5  0x0012c67c in mono_magic_trampoline (regs=0x558fd090, code=0x427f8f0c
> "\367\377\377\352", arg=0x2a08a000, tramp=0x2e4bcd80 "x\320\217U") at
> mini-trampolines.c:690
> #6  0x403f5060 in ?? ()
> #7  0x403f5060 in ?? ()
>
>  All 6 threads where in a trampoline. The method in frame 4 was
> "mono_thread_interruption_checkpoint" for all six threads.
>
>  Does this give you any more clues into what is going on?
>
>  This is blocking our upgrade to mono-3-0 unfortunately. Any help will be
> greatly appreciated.
>
>   From: Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 3:20 AM
> To: Bassam Tabbara <bassam at symform.com>
> Cc: "mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com" <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Assert in mini-arm.c
>
>   Hi,
>
>    This is a JIT problem, it will be hard to track down without a
> testcase. You can try changing this line in mono/utils/mono-codeman.c:
>
>  #define BIND_ROOM 8
>
>  to
>
>  #define BIND_ROOM 4
>
>  It might fix the issue.
>
>             Zoltan
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Bassam Tabbara <bassam at symform.com>wrote:
>
>>  Folks,
>>
>>  Any insights into why the assert would trigger? Is this a resource
>> exhaustion issue, or is specific to certain code that is being JITed? I
>> need someone to point me in the right direction. I'm able to reproduce this
>> but only in the context of our application. This did not happen with the
>> mono-2-10 branch.
>>
>>  Thanks!
>> Bassam
>>
>>   From: Bassam Tabbara <bassam at symform.com>
>> Date: Friday, August 9, 2013 10:36 AM
>> To: "mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com" <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
>> Subject: [Mono-dev] Assert in mini-arm.c
>>
>>   Hello,
>>
>>  I'm seeing the following assert on an armv5tel using latest from master:
>>
>>  http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=CLDXxiPy
>>
>>  I'm trying to get an isolated repro but it proving to be elusive. In
>> our full test runs we see this all the time.
>>
>>  Any tips on how to debug this further?
>>
>>  Thanks!
>>  Bassam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20130814/e2a56dcd/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list