[Mono-dev] ConcurrentQueue

[Greg Young]

I can't as I am about to head out of country (its also spuratic behaviour)

I believe @yuriy probably can though.

Cheers,

Greg

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Jérémie Laval <jeremie.laval at gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you run you program in debug mode and paste the line number where the
> problem happen?
>
> --
> Jérémie Laval
> http://neteril.org
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Greg Young <gregoryyoung1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> trunk.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Alan <alan.mcgovern at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > What version of Mono are you testing against?
>> >
>> > Alan
>> >
>> > On 10 August 2012 09:52, Greg Young <gregoryyoung1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> We regularly can cause problems with ConcurrentQueue such as
>> >>
>> >> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance
>> >> of an object
>> >>   at
>> >> System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentQueue`1[System.IO.FileStream].TryDequeue
>> >> (System.IO.FileStream& result) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
>> >>   at SStable.PTable.GetFileStream () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
>> >>   at SStable.PTable+<GetRange>c__Iterator2.MoveNext () [0x00000] in
>> >> <filename unknown>:0
>> >>   at SStable.PTable.TryGetValue (UInt32 stream, UInt32 version,
>> >> System.UInt64[]& position) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
>> >>   at SStable.TableIndex.TryGetValueInternal (UInt32 stream, UInt32
>> >> version, System.UInt64[]& position) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
>> >>   at SStable.TableIndex.TryGetValue (UInt32 stream, UInt32 version,
>> >> System.UInt64[]& position) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
>> >>   at IndexKiller.Program.ReadItems (SStable.TableIndex index,
>> >> System.Threading.AutoResetEvent autoResetEvent) [0x00000] in <filename
>> >> unknown>:0
>> >>   at IndexKiller.Program+<Main>c__AnonStorey1.<>m__0 (System.Object x)
>> >> [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
>> >>
>> >> We have posted up repros before but basically just pound on it with
>> >> five threads (each thread add and removes 1 item)
>> >>
>> >> It seems object pool is still buggy.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Le doute n'est pas une condition agréable, mais la certitude est
>> >> absurde.
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> >> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Le doute n'est pas une condition agréable, mais la certitude est absurde.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>



-- 
Le doute n'est pas une condition agréable, mais la certitude est absurde.