[Mono-dev] [PATCH] more support for Google Native Client

Elijah Taylor elijahtaylor at google.com
Wed Jan 5 20:22:00 EST 2011


Ok, I'll check out the changes/info you mentioned and go through the files
that auto-merged, too.  Probably won't get this done for at least a day or
so, but I'll rebase again once I've fixed it.  Hopefully by that point
something else won't have broken too :)

-Elijah


On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>   This should work as follows: every aot image contains a MonoAotFileInfo
> structure,
> emitted in emit_file_info () in aot-compiler.c,  which has a 'flags' field,
> and the MONO_AOT_FILE_FLAG_FULL_AOT flag should be set in
> this field. At runtime, check_usable() in aot-runtime.c checks this flag.
>
>                         Zoltan
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Elijah Taylor <elijahtaylor at google.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Zoltan,
>>>
>>> I've rebased from mono's master branch and fixed all merge conflicts, but
>>> something that's gone in since I first forked has now broken NaCl AOT
>>> compilation for me.  On amd64 the compiler just crashes and I'm looking into
>>> that, nut on x86 I'm getting this: Can't use AOT image 'mscorlib' in
>>> aot-only mode because it is not compiled with --aot=full. But I'm
>>> compiling with --aot=full,static,nodebug,ntrampolines=4096
>>>
>>> If need be I can pick through the AOT changes that have gone in, but I
>>> was hoping you or someone on this list would be able to tell me the major
>>> changes to AOT from the past 3 weeks and some ideas about what might be
>>> getting in my way.  Can you shed any light?
>>>
>>>
>> There was a big reorganization in the AOT file format to reduce the number
>> of global symbols exported from the aot images. No idea why this is causing
>> problems. make fullaotcheck and make fsacheck still seems to work for me on
>> x86. I fixed a uninitilized memory error in 88d676ffd425def3, maybe that
>> will help.
>>
>>                                     Zoltan
>>
>>>  -Elijah
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>   I think the current code looks ok, and we should think about how to
>>>> merge it into mono trunk. As a first step, could you rebase your master
>>>> branch on top of master to fix the few conflicts which has surfaced due to
>>>> changes to mono master ?
>>>>
>>>>                  Zoltan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Elijah Taylor <elijahtaylor at google.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Zoltan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've addressed all of the issues you pointed out (minus genmdesc.c:
>>>>> __nacl_suspend_thread_if_needed, but that doesn't need to be merged in at
>>>>> this time, it can remain in my local repository only).  Please take another
>>>>> look at your earliest convenience and let me know if there's anything else
>>>>> you need from me.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Elijah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Elijah Taylor <
>>>>> elijahtaylor at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Replies inline:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Some comments:
>>>>>>> - the patch changes IMT_REG to AMD64_R11 in the non-nacl case, I'm
>>>>>>> not sure thats
>>>>>>>   intentional.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has this changed in the last six months on the Mono side?  IIRC I
>>>>>> didn't mean to change anything like this.  The reason I made explicit
>>>>>> defines was so code in aot-compiler and mini-amd64 could share defines over
>>>>>> which reg was the one we jump through and which was a scratch reg.  I'll
>>>>>> diff vs Mono head revision and make it correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - you could define __mono_ilp32__ in the nacl/amd64 case, and use
>>>>>>> that instead of
>>>>>>>   defined(__native_client_codegen__) && defined(TARGET_AMD64) in a
>>>>>>> few places.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That sounds reasonable.  I'm assuming you mean non-arch specific areas
>>>>>> like mini.c, aot-*.c, method-to-ir.c, etc?  Are there any other major
>>>>>> consequences to defining __mono_ilp32__ ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - it would be better to define nacl_global_codeman_validate () as a
>>>>>>> no-op in the non-nacl case, so its callers wouldn't need #ifdefs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll fix this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - genmdesc.c contains this change, which is probably not needed:
>>>>>>> +void __nacl_suspend_thread_if_needed() {}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is needed temporarily due to a preliminary GC implementation, we
>>>>>> don't have to submit it this way.  Eventually (soon) we won't need it at
>>>>>> all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - you could use sizeof(mgreg_t) instead of SIZEOF_REGISTER to be
>>>>>>> consistent with
>>>>>>>   the usage of sizeof(gpointer).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds good.  I'll try to use sizeof for all compiled code and only
>>>>>> use SIZEOF_REGISTER/SIZEOF_VOID_P for pre-processor directives only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other than these, I think the changes look fine, they aren't that
>>>>>>> disruptive, since they don't
>>>>>>> change the non-nacl behavior at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great!  I was worried just based on LOC changed that it might get more
>>>>>> resistance.  In truth I'm more worried about future Mono changes
>>>>>> accidentally breaking NaCl behavior.  I'm planning on getting some automated
>>>>>> testing implemented soon to combat this though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Elijah Taylor <
>>>>>>> elijahtaylor at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Greetings Mono developers!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *[tl;dr  very large patch for Native Client<http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient> support
>>>>>>>> hosted here <https://github.com/elijahtaylor/mono>, would love
>>>>>>>> feedback and many eyes to look at it]
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm back with another round of changes for supporting Google's
>>>>>>>> Native Client (NaCl), including support for amd64, JIT compilation, and
>>>>>>>> Garbage Collection.  It's a large set of changes, forked on Dec 14 in github
>>>>>>>> @ https://github.com/elijahtaylor/mono.  I would appreciate
>>>>>>>> feedback on these changes... to facilitate this, I'll try to explain the
>>>>>>>> largest changes by feature (please email if clarification is needed):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *1) amd64 codegen*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - Rules located here:
>>>>>>>>    http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/design-documents/nacl-sfi-model-on-x86-64-systems
>>>>>>>>       - Removed %r15 from register allocation, LMF save/restore,
>>>>>>>>       etc.  (r15 is special and not modifiable by untrusted code)
>>>>>>>>       - Sandbox all data access through membase address mode.  If
>>>>>>>>       not %rsp or %rbp relative, re-write as clearing upper 32-bits + memindex
>>>>>>>>       addressing
>>>>>>>>       - align functions, call sites
>>>>>>>>       - Sandbox returns and all indirect jumps (need to be 32-byte
>>>>>>>>       aligned, cleared upper 32-bits)
>>>>>>>>       - Never omit frame pointer as general operations to rbp
>>>>>>>>       aren't allowed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *2) NaCl x86-64 is ILP32 (this is the largest set of changes and
>>>>>>>> may make some mono devs unhappy)*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - Set SIZEOF_REGISTER == 8 while sizeof(gpointer) == 4 for NaCl
>>>>>>>>    amd64 (we can use 8-byte instructions, but pointers are 4-bytes)
>>>>>>>>    - Re-write large portions of mini-amd64.c, tramp-amd64.c,
>>>>>>>>    exceptions-amd64.c, mini.c, method-to-ir.c to use appropriate sizes
>>>>>>>>    (SIZEOF_REGISTER, sizeof(gpointer), literal '8').  *These
>>>>>>>>    changes are disruptive, but ultimately they should be more correct than what
>>>>>>>>    was there before.  *It's our opinion that these changes actually
>>>>>>>>    improve Mono despite their impact.
>>>>>>>>    - We only generate NaCl amd64 code from an ILP32 machine (either
>>>>>>>>    a 32-bit application for AOT code, or NaCl runtime JIT), so we may not have
>>>>>>>>    caught all of the [8 <--> SIZEOF_REGISTER] conversions, but we likely caught
>>>>>>>>    most of the [sizeof(gpointer) <--> SIZEOF_REGISTER] and [8 <-->
>>>>>>>>    sizeof(gpointer)] changes that are necessary.
>>>>>>>>    - Change atomic operations and default pointer directives to use
>>>>>>>>    32-bit instructions (long instead of quad)
>>>>>>>>    - Change default operations to use 32-bit integers/pointers (eg,
>>>>>>>>    OP_LOAD_MEMBASE uses 4-bytes instead of 8)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *3) JIT support for NaCl*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - Since we're unable to emit code directly in its final
>>>>>>>>    executable location, we instead:
>>>>>>>>       - reserve a buffer on the heap
>>>>>>>>       - create a hash table entry mapping the temp location and
>>>>>>>>       final location
>>>>>>>>       - modify all non-local patches relative to the final location
>>>>>>>>       - request the NaCl runtime to install the created code in the
>>>>>>>>       final location
>>>>>>>>    - See mono/utils/mono-codeman.c changes for more detail.
>>>>>>>>    - For every codeman *reserve*, we must add a codeman *validate*call in order to install the method/trampoline/blob in the final location
>>>>>>>>    (as well as validate it for NaCl, pad it out, etc)
>>>>>>>>    - We don't delete or reuse code  (we can, but it's icky and the
>>>>>>>>    benefits don't outweigh the cost)
>>>>>>>>    - Backpatching changed to use NaCl syscalls to modify existing
>>>>>>>>    dynamic code
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *4) GC support for NaCl (boehm only)*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - NaCl compiler and Mono code generator both emit
>>>>>>>>    instrumentation at GC "safe points" (back branches and function prologs),
>>>>>>>>    for cooperative thread parking (we're not allowed to send and receive
>>>>>>>>    signals)
>>>>>>>>    - Added new opcode OP_NACL_GC_SAFE_POINT to handle mono
>>>>>>>>    instrumentation
>>>>>>>>    - modified pthread_stop_world.c and pthread_support.c somewhat
>>>>>>>>    extensively to support this new way of stopping the world
>>>>>>>>    - wrapped pthread_exit because NaCl doesn't support pthread
>>>>>>>>    cleanup functions
>>>>>>>>    - added machine type NACL to libgc with machine specific defines
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *5) Misc bug fixes (not NaCl-specific)*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - fix *x86_memindex_emit* when disp is 32-bit
>>>>>>>>    - properly exclude code in libgc/gc_dlopen.c when
>>>>>>>>    DYNAMIC_LOADING not defined
>>>>>>>>    - properly exclude code based on DISABLE_SOCKETS by including
>>>>>>>>    config.h before checking define
>>>>>>>>    - clean up calculation of offset for amd64 AOT specific
>>>>>>>>    trampoline args
>>>>>>>>    - fix bug in *mono_bblock_insert_before_ins* when trying to
>>>>>>>>    insert an instruction to the beginning of an existing basic block.
>>>>>>>>    - fix small typo bug in genmdesc.pl which kept amd64 from being
>>>>>>>>    able to be a target of cross compiling
>>>>>>>>    - fix struct passing in amd64 with sizeof(struct) == 16 when
>>>>>>>>    fields aren't 8-byte aligned (eg, first field is 12 bytes, second field is 4
>>>>>>>>    bytes), pass on stack instead of in registers (mini-amd64.c:*
>>>>>>>>    add_valuetype*)
>>>>>>>>    - add extra checks to mini-amd64.c:*mono_arch_emit_exceptions*to keep exception/R4/R8 emitting from overflowing a buffer silently
>>>>>>>>    - fix bugs in *new_codechunk* and *
>>>>>>>>    mono_code_manager_reserve_align* which allowed unaligned code to
>>>>>>>>    be allocated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know we're close to holidays so I don't have any delusions that
>>>>>>>> these changes will get in by the end of the year :)  Please feel free to
>>>>>>>> pick apart these changes and let me know if there are things that should be
>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Elijah
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>>>>>>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>>>>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20110105/933dbcfc/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list