[Mono-dev] System.NotImplementedException: The requestedfeature is not implemented. atSystem.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
Greg Robinson
gregarobinson at gmail.com
Wed May 26 10:37:15 EDT 2010
Awesome, thanks! I found your blog today too, Good stuff.
I would love to be able to contribute; we simply do not have the resources
to offer right now.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Atsushi Eno <
atsushieno at veritas-vos-liberabit.com> wrote:
> I'm working on it, yes ;)
>
> On 2010/05/26 21:06, Greg Robinson wrote:
> > Atsushi Eno, are you on thew Mono development team? Great feedback,
> > just curious.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Matt Dargavel
> > <matt at shout-telecoms.com <mailto:matt at shout-telecoms.com>> wrote:
> >
> > When I was trying some WCF stuff out I found some scenarios where
> > the app.config settings didn’t work, but using their code based
> > counter-parts did. But Atsushi-san is the man in the know, so it
> > looks like the Credentials types will only work for some basic
> > http authentication.
> >
> > Matt.
> >
> > *From:* Greg Robinson [mailto:gregarobinson at gmail.com
> > <mailto:gregarobinson at gmail.com>]
> > *Sent:* 25 May 2010 9:10 PM
> > *To:* Matt Dargavel
> >
> > *Cc:* mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> > *Subject:* Re: [Mono-dev] System.NotImplementedException: The
> > requestedfeature is not implemented.
> >
> atSystem.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
> >
> > Matt,
> >
> > " it looks like most of the ClientCredentials class is done so you
> > might be able to configure the necessary ClientCredentials in code
> > rather than using .config files. "
> >
> > So are you stating Mono is not app.config file "friendly"? So it's
> > possible if we "hard code" these bits will run under Mono?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Matt Dargavel
> > <matt at shout-telecoms.com <mailto:matt at shout-telecoms.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Have you tried running MoMA (http://www.mono-project.com/MoMa)
> > against your application? This should give you an idea of how
> > much is missing from Mono.
> >
> > With respect to WCF and the specific problem you saw, I’ve not
> > used the security stuff at all but it looks like most of the
> > ClientCredentials class is done so you might be able to configure
> > the necessary ClientCredentials in code rather than using .config
> > files. I don’t think the System.ServiceModel.Configuration
> > namespace is as complete as some of the other bits. You can find
> > information on the implementation status at the links below.
> >
> >
> http://go-mono.com/status/status.aspx?reference=3.5&profile=2.0&assembly=System.ServiceModel
> > <
> http://go-mono.com/status/status.aspx?reference=3.5&profile=2.0&assembly=System.ServiceModel
> >
> >
> > http://www.mono-project.com/WCF
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Matt.
> >
> > *From:* mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com>
> > [mailto:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com>] *On Behalf Of
> > *Greg Robinson
> > *Sent:* 25 May 2010 7:09 PM
> > *To:* Stifu
> > *Cc:* mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> > *Subject:* Re: [Mono-dev] System.NotImplementedException: The
> > requestedfeature is not implemented.
> >
> atSystem.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
> >
> > Understood, and that was my first thought. Was just wondering if
> > there were alternative solutions.
> >
> > I am thinking of a Java/.NET split if you will where we keep what
> > we can that WILL run under Mono and port the rest to Java. That
> > assumes we can get the two to play nicely together.
> >
> > Is there a way to see if someone is already working on the bits in
> > Mono we need?
> >
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Stifu <stifu at free.fr
> > <mailto:stifu at free.fr>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The obvious answer: contribute to Mono and help implement it. Or
> > pay someone
> > to do it.
> > That's what some companies do. If you can afford it, that's an
> > option (which
> > might turn out to be cheaper than rewriting everything in Java;
> > that said, I
> > have no idea how much work is needed here).
> >
> >
> >
> > Greg Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > I am new to Linux, new to Mono. I am really hoping we can use
> > Mono for our
> > > .NET application to Linux port/migration.
> > >
> > > The other option on the table is to totally re-write in Java.
> > >
> > > So what do folks usually do at this point; the point where they
> > find that
> > > something they need, our .NET Server application calling a WCF
> > Service
> > > using
> > > System.ServiceModel bits, not implemented in Mono? It seems a
> > shame to
> > > just
> > > give up and do a port to Java; is that my only solution though?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Miguel de Icaza
> > <miguel at novell.com <mailto:miguel at novell.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> > When I go to:
> > >> >
> > >> > http://mono-project.com/DistroPackages/Ubuntu
> > >> >
> > >> > it tells me Mono comes installed by default. We are running
> > Ubuntu
> > >> > 10.04.
> > >> >
> > >> > What do I need to do to upgrade to Mono 2.6 on Ubuntu 10.04?
> > >>
> > >> I am told that there are no 2.6 packages available for Ubuntu
> > by the
> > >> Debian/Ubuntu community.
> > >>
> > >> The bad news is that you need to compile from source code;
> > The good
> > >> news is that this is a trivial process (as long as you use
> released
> > >> tarballs):
> > >>
> > >> http://www.mono-project.com/Parallel_Mono_Environments
> > >>
> > >> Migue.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Oskar Berggren
> > >> > <oskar.berggren at gmail.com <mailto:oskar.berggren at gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > >> > 2.2 is fairly old. Have you checked with 2.4 or 2.6?
> > >> >
> > >> > Try searching for "moma" and "mono class library
> status".
> > >> >
> > >> > /Oskar
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2010/5/24 Greg Robinson <gregarobinson at gmail.com
> > <mailto:gregarobinson at gmail.com>>:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I have been making good progress on moving our .NET server
> > >> > application over
> > >> > > to Mono 2.2 running on Ubuntu 2.2.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Friday, I ported the WCF pieces over where all the server
> > >> > application does
> > >> > > is make calls to a WCF service running on a windows server
> > >> > outside of our
> > >> > > office.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I am getting the following, which suggests to me these
> > >> > pieces of "client
> > >> > > side" WCF are not implemented in Mono 2.2:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature is
> > >> > not implemented.
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
> > >> > > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.StandardBindingElement.ApplyConfiguration
> > >> > > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> >
> > System.ServiceModel.Configuration.ConfigUtil.CreateBinding
> > >> > > (System.String binding, System.String bindingConfiguration)
> > >> > [0x00000]
> > >> > > at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.ApplyConfiguration
> > >> > (System.String
> > >> > > endpointConfig) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.InitializeEndpoint
> > >> > (System.String
> > >> > > endpointConfigurationName,
> > >> > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress
> > >> > > remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory`1[OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.IOurCompanyNameService]..ctor
> > >> > > (System.String endpointConfigurationName,
> > >> > > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel].Initialize
> > >> > > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
> > >> > configName,
> > >> > > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
> > >> > > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
> > >> > configname)
> > >> > > [0x00000]
> > >> > > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
> > >> > > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor ()
> > >> > [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.OurCompanyNameServiceClient..ctor
> > >> > > () [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
> > >> > > (Boolean useLimited) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
> > >> > > () [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
> > >> > > (System.String loggerSAN) [0x00000]
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
> > >> > > () [0x00000]
> > >> > > at OurCompanyNameWCFClientTest.Program.Main
> > >> > (System.String[] args)
> > >> > > [0x00000]
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Any idea if\when this will be implemented? is there a
> > >> > workaround?
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Greg
> > >> > >
> > >> > > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > >> > > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > >> > > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > >> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > >> > > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> > >> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Greg
> > >> >
> > >> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > >> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > >> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> > >> > My Company:
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > >> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> > >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Greg
> > >
> > > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> > > My Company:
> > >
> >
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/System-NotImplementedException-The-requested-feature-is-not-implemented-at-System-ServiceModel-Confin-tp2228515p2230442.html
> > Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> >
> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> > My Company:
> >
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> >
> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> > My Company:
> >
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> >
> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> > My Company:
> >
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
--
Greg
My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
My Company:
http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20100526/9a3b7652/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list