[Mono-dev] System.NotImplementedException: The requestedfeature is not implemented. atSystem.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration

Greg Robinson gregarobinson at gmail.com
Tue May 25 15:45:40 EDT 2010


Thanks, running MoMA is one of the first things I did when I started looking
at Mono. Much to my surprise it did not find any errors.



On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Matt Dargavel <matt at shout-telecoms.com>wrote:

>  Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> Have you tried running MoMA (http://www.mono-project.com/MoMa) against
> your application?  This should give you an idea of how much is missing from
> Mono.
>
>
>
> With respect to WCF and the specific problem you saw, I’ve not used the
> security stuff at all but it looks like most of the ClientCredentials class
> is done so you might be able to configure the necessary ClientCredentials in
> code rather than using .config files.  I don’t think the
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration namespace is as complete as some of the
> other bits.  You can find information on the implementation status at the
> links below.
>
>
>
>
> http://go-mono.com/status/status.aspx?reference=3.5&profile=2.0&assembly=System.ServiceModel
>
> http://www.mono-project.com/WCF
>
>
>
>                 Regards,
>
>
>
>                                 Matt.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com [mailto:
> mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com] *On Behalf Of *Greg Robinson
> *Sent:* 25 May 2010 7:09 PM
> *To:* Stifu
> *Cc:* mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Mono-dev] System.NotImplementedException: The
> requestedfeature is not implemented.
> atSystem.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
>
>
>
> Understood, and that was my first thought. Was just wondering if there were
> alternative solutions.
>
> I am thinking of a Java/.NET split if you will where we keep what we can
> that WILL run under Mono and port the rest to Java. That assumes we can get
> the two to play nicely together.
>
> Is there a way to see if someone is already working on the bits in Mono we
> need?
>
>
>  On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Stifu <stifu at free.fr> wrote:
>
>
> The obvious answer: contribute to Mono and help implement it. Or pay
> someone
> to do it.
> That's what some companies do. If you can afford it, that's an option
> (which
> might turn out to be cheaper than rewriting everything in Java; that said,
> I
> have no idea how much work is needed here).
>
>
>
> Greg Robinson wrote:
> >
> > I am new to Linux, new to Mono. I am really hoping we can use Mono for
> our
> > .NET application to Linux port/migration.
> >
> > The other option on the table is to totally re-write in Java.
> >
> > So what do folks usually do at this point; the point where they find that
> > something they need, our .NET Server application calling a WCF Service
> > using
> > System.ServiceModel bits, not implemented in Mono? It seems a shame to
> > just
> > give up and do a port to Java; is that my only solution though?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Miguel de Icaza <miguel at novell.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > When I go to:
> >> >
> >> > http://mono-project.com/DistroPackages/Ubuntu
> >> >
> >> > it tells me Mono comes installed by default. We are running Ubuntu
> >> > 10.04.
> >> >
> >> > What do I need to do to upgrade to Mono 2.6 on Ubuntu 10.04?
> >>
> >> I am told that there are no 2.6 packages available for Ubuntu by the
> >> Debian/Ubuntu community.
> >>
> >> The bad news is that you need to compile from source code;   The good
> >> news is that this is a trivial process (as long as you use released
> >> tarballs):
> >>
> >> http://www.mono-project.com/Parallel_Mono_Environments
> >>
> >> Migue.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Oskar Berggren
> >> > <oskar.berggren at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >         2.2 is fairly old. Have you checked with 2.4 or 2.6?
> >> >
> >> >         Try searching for "moma" and "mono class library status".
> >> >
> >> >         /Oskar
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >         2010/5/24 Greg Robinson <gregarobinson at gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >         >  I have been making good progress on moving our .NET server
> >> >         application over
> >> >         > to Mono 2.2 running on Ubuntu 2.2.
> >> >         >
> >> >         >  Friday, I ported the WCF pieces over where all the server
> >> >         application does
> >> >         > is make calls to a WCF service running on a windows server
> >> >         outside of our
> >> >         > office.
> >> >         >
> >> >         >  I am getting the following, which suggests to me these
> >> >         pieces of "client
> >> >         > side" WCF are not implemented in Mono 2.2:
> >> >         >
> >> >         >  System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature is
> >> >         not implemented.
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
> >> >         > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.StandardBindingElement.ApplyConfiguration
> >> >         > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         System.ServiceModel.Configuration.ConfigUtil.CreateBinding
> >> >         > (System.String binding, System.String bindingConfiguration)
> >> >         [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.ApplyConfiguration
> >> >         (System.String
> >> >         > endpointConfig) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.InitializeEndpoint
> >> >         (System.String
> >> >         > endpointConfigurationName,
> >> >         System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress
> >> >         > remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory`1[OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.IOurCompanyNameService]..ctor
> >> >         > (System.String endpointConfigurationName,
> >> >         > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel].Initialize
> >> >         > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
> >> >         configName,
> >> >         > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
> >> >         > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
> >> >         configname)
> >> >         > [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
> >> >         > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor ()
> >> >         [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.OurCompanyNameServiceClient..ctor
> >> >         > () [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
> >> >         > (Boolean useLimited) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
> >> >         > () [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
> >> >         > (System.String loggerSAN) [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >>
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
> >> >         > () [0x00000]
> >> >         >  at OurCompanyNameWCFClientTest.Program.Main
> >> >         (System.String[] args)
> >> >         > [0x00000]
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         > Any idea if\when this will be implemented? is there a
> >> >         workaround?
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         > Thanks
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >         > --
> >> >         > Greg
> >> >         >
> >> >         > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> >> >         > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> >> >         > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> >> >         > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >> >         > _______________________________________________
> >> >         > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> >> >         > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> >> >         > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >> >         >
> >> >         >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Greg
> >> >
> >> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> >> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> >> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> >> > My Company:
> >> >
> >>
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> >> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> >
> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> > My Company:
> >
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> View this message in context:
> http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/System-NotImplementedException-The-requested-feature-is-not-implemented-at-System-ServiceModel-Confin-tp2228515p2230442.html
> Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
>
>
> --
> Greg
>
> My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> My Company:
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
>



-- 
Greg

My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
My Company:
http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20100525/0fd51a40/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list