[Mono-dev] System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature is not implemented. at System.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration

Stifu stifu at free.fr
Tue May 25 14:05:50 EDT 2010 

The obvious answer: contribute to Mono and help implement it. Or pay someone
to do it.
That's what some companies do. If you can afford it, that's an option (which
might turn out to be cheaper than rewriting everything in Java; that said, I
have no idea how much work is needed here).


Greg Robinson wrote:
> 
> I am new to Linux, new to Mono. I am really hoping we can use Mono for our
> .NET application to Linux port/migration.
> 
> The other option on the table is to totally re-write in Java.
> 
> So what do folks usually do at this point; the point where they find that
> something they need, our .NET Server application calling a WCF Service
> using
> System.ServiceModel bits, not implemented in Mono? It seems a shame to
> just
> give up and do a port to Java; is that my only solution though?
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Miguel de Icaza <miguel at novell.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> > When I go to:
>> >
>> > http://mono-project.com/DistroPackages/Ubuntu
>> >
>> > it tells me Mono comes installed by default. We are running Ubuntu
>> > 10.04.
>> >
>> > What do I need to do to upgrade to Mono 2.6 on Ubuntu 10.04?
>>
>> I am told that there are no 2.6 packages available for Ubuntu by the
>> Debian/Ubuntu community.
>>
>> The bad news is that you need to compile from source code;   The good
>> news is that this is a trivial process (as long as you use released
>> tarballs):
>>
>> http://www.mono-project.com/Parallel_Mono_Environments
>>
>> Migue.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Oskar Berggren
>> > <oskar.berggren at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >         2.2 is fairly old. Have you checked with 2.4 or 2.6?
>> >
>> >         Try searching for "moma" and "mono class library status".
>> >
>> >         /Oskar
>> >
>> >
>> >         2010/5/24 Greg Robinson <gregarobinson at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >         >  I have been making good progress on moving our .NET server
>> >         application over
>> >         > to Mono 2.2 running on Ubuntu 2.2.
>> >         >
>> >         >  Friday, I ported the WCF pieces over where all the server
>> >         application does
>> >         > is make calls to a WCF service running on a windows server
>> >         outside of our
>> >         > office.
>> >         >
>> >         >  I am getting the following, which suggests to me these
>> >         pieces of "client
>> >         > side" WCF are not implemented in Mono 2.2:
>> >         >
>> >         >  System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature is
>> >         not implemented.
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
>> >         > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.StandardBindingElement.ApplyConfiguration
>> >         > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         System.ServiceModel.Configuration.ConfigUtil.CreateBinding
>> >         > (System.String binding, System.String bindingConfiguration)
>> >         [0x00000]
>> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.ApplyConfiguration
>> >         (System.String
>> >         > endpointConfig) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.InitializeEndpoint
>> >         (System.String
>> >         > endpointConfigurationName,
>> >         System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress
>> >         > remoteAddress) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory`1[OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.IOurCompanyNameService]..ctor
>> >         > (System.String endpointConfigurationName,
>> >         > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel].Initialize
>> >         > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
>> >         configName,
>> >         > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
>> >         > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
>> >         configname)
>> >         > [0x00000]
>> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
>> >         > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor ()
>> >         [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.OurCompanyNameServiceClient..ctor
>> >         > () [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
>> >         > (Boolean useLimited) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
>> >         > () [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
>> >         > (System.String loggerSAN) [0x00000]
>> >         >  at
>> >         >
>> >
>> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
>> >         > () [0x00000]
>> >         >  at OurCompanyNameWCFClientTest.Program.Main
>> >         (System.String[] args)
>> >         > [0x00000]
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         > Any idea if\when this will be implemented? is there a
>> >         workaround?
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         > Thanks
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         > --
>> >         > Greg
>> >         >
>> >         > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
>> >         > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
>> >         > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
>> >         > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
>> >         >
>> >
>> >         > _______________________________________________
>> >         > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> >         > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> >         > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Greg
>> >
>> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
>> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
>> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
>> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
>> > My Company:
>> >
>> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg
> 
> My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> My Company:
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/System-NotImplementedException-The-requested-feature-is-not-implemented-at-System-ServiceModel-Confin-tp2228515p2230442.html
Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list