[Mono-dev] System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature is not implemented. at System.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
Miguel de Icaza
miguel at novell.com
Tue May 25 12:45:23 EDT 2010
> When I go to:
>
> http://mono-project.com/DistroPackages/Ubuntu
>
> it tells me Mono comes installed by default. We are running Ubuntu
> 10.04.
>
> What do I need to do to upgrade to Mono 2.6 on Ubuntu 10.04?
I am told that there are no 2.6 packages available for Ubuntu by the
Debian/Ubuntu community.
The bad news is that you need to compile from source code; The good
news is that this is a trivial process (as long as you use released
tarballs):
http://www.mono-project.com/Parallel_Mono_Environments
Migue.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Oskar Berggren
> <oskar.berggren at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2.2 is fairly old. Have you checked with 2.4 or 2.6?
>
> Try searching for "moma" and "mono class library status".
>
> /Oskar
>
>
> 2010/5/24 Greg Robinson <gregarobinson at gmail.com>:
>
> > I have been making good progress on moving our .NET server
> application over
> > to Mono 2.2 running on Ubuntu 2.2.
> >
> > Friday, I ported the WCF pieces over where all the server
> application does
> > is make calls to a WCF service running on a windows server
> outside of our
> > office.
> >
> > I am getting the following, which suggests to me these
> pieces of "client
> > side" WCF are not implemented in Mono 2.2:
> >
> > System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature is
> not implemented.
> > at
> >
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration
> > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
> > at
> >
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.StandardBindingElement.ApplyConfiguration
> > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000]
> > at
> System.ServiceModel.Configuration.ConfigUtil.CreateBinding
> > (System.String binding, System.String bindingConfiguration)
> [0x00000]
> > at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.ApplyConfiguration
> (System.String
> > endpointConfig) [0x00000]
> > at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.InitializeEndpoint
> (System.String
> > endpointConfigurationName,
> System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress
> > remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> > at
> >
> System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory`1[OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.IOurCompanyNameService]..ctor
> > (System.String endpointConfigurationName,
> > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel].Initialize
> > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
> configName,
> > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) [0x00000]
> > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
> > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, System.String
> configname)
> > [0x00000]
> > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor
> > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance) [0x00000]
> > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor ()
> [0x00000]
> > at
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.OurCompanyNameServiceClient..ctor
> > () [0x00000]
> > at
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
> > (Boolean useLimited) [0x00000]
> > at
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy
> > () [0x00000]
> > at
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
> > (System.String loggerSAN) [0x00000]
> > at
> >
> OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration
> > () [0x00000]
> > at OurCompanyNameWCFClientTest.Program.Main
> (System.String[] args)
> > [0x00000]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Any idea if\when this will be implemented? is there a
> workaround?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> >
> > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Greg
>
> My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/
> My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/
> Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson
> My Company:
> http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list