[Mono-dev] [PATCH] MONO_IOMAP reporting option - string allocation locations

Rodrigo Kumpera kumpera at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 12:48:40 EST 2009

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Marek Habersack <grendel at twistedcode.net>wrote:

> On 11/27/2009 02:29 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
>> I agree with Zoltan, we better figure out how to extend the profilling
>> interface to support such tool than
> it would defy the purpose of the tool, but it seems I can remove the code
> from mono_string_new_utf16 without harming functionality - would that be ok?
Why using the profilling interface defy the purpose of the tool? I can't see
how passing an extra argument to the mono runtime be a problem.
My main issue is about bloat, if we can make it work as an external tool
just fine, I don't see a reason to add it to the runtime.
As I mentioned, we can extend the profiling API to fit your needs.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20091127/fef0979f/attachment.html 

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list