[Mono-dev] What mono branch/tag to use from svn

[Joachim Ante]

Hi,

One more question. The binary builds that are up here:
http://www.go-mono.com/mono-downloads/download.html

Do these downloads exactly match the tagged mono 2.4 folder in svn?  
Or were they build from the mono 2.4 branch?

The reason why I am slightly confused here is because on the Mac OS X  
download page it says:
Mono 2.4_7. Does this mean there have been 7 updates to the Mac OS X  
dmg installer after 2.4 was shipped? Or why is a "_7" appended to the  
release name?

Joachim Ante

> Hi,
>
> I am still looking for a solution to this so I can get mono 2.4  
> running in Unity.
>
> So far we found out:
> * It works in the 2.4 branch (On other peoples machines and my  
> machine)
> * On my machine it does not work in the 2.4 tag svn checkout
>
> Since we are using the tag and not the branch, how do I fix the  
> issue? Or specifically which checkin did fix the issue?
>
> Joachim Ante
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just checked with the latest mono 2.4 installer and it works  
>> correctly there on os x.
>>
>> The tagged mono 2.4 http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/tags/ 
>> mono-2-4/mono
>> does have the problem on my machine.
>>
>> Can someone confirm that the tagged mono-2-4 has this issue?
>>
>> Joachim Ante
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>   I can't reproduce that bug with the stock mono 2.4 release on  
>>> linux, maybe it is a mac-only
>>> bug ?
>>>
>>>              Zoltan
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Joachim Ante <joe at unity3d.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are in the process of upgrading Unity to mono 2.4.
>>>
>>> I ran into one showstopper bug, that we want to get through asap.
>>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500385
>>>
>>> To build our mono we used tags mono-2-4
>>>
>>> http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/tags/mono-2-4/mono
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Is this the right place to pull the most stable version of  
>>> mono that has gone through a full test pass?
>>>
>>> 2. At least for us the bug is still present on that tag.  
>>> Sebastian says it's fixed in 2.4 branch. Does anyone know which  
>>> specific checkin has fixed this issue?
>>>
>>> 3. Do you guys usually replace the tags when releasing an update  
>>> to mono 2.4 or do you create a new tag?
>>> It seems like the binary installer has revision 6 in it, but  
>>> there is no corresponding tag folder on svn.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Joachim Ante
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20090508/1fb6e86b/attachment.html