[Mono-dev] Qt anyone?

[Arno Rehn]

On Linux it's pretty straight forward. Download a recent kde-bindings tarball 
and extract it somewhere. Build it as every other KDE module with cmake.
Create a build directory, do "cd build-dir; ccmake src-dir". Disable the stuff 
you don't want/don't need, like Soprano or Nepomuk bindings. Then just "make; 
make install" as usual.
We haven't tried building on Solaris yet. On OS X someone got it working, but 
there seem to be issues with header files not being correctly found. You might 
have to play a bit to get it working there.

On Friday 06 February 2009 20:36:29 pablosantosluac at terra.es wrote:
> are there tutorials to build on Mac/Linux/Solaris?
>
> Daniel Morgan escribió:
> > Qyoto / Kimono Project
> > http://ekarchive.elikirk.com/david/qyoto/
> >
> > Here is a different project with a similar goal of creating CLR bindings
> > for qt - qt4dotnet http://code.google.com/p/qt4dotnet/
> >
> > If you google, you might be able to find ancient C# bindings to qt called
> > qt# - but it has been abandoned.
> >
> > On a different subject, I wonder if someone would dare replace the glib
> > and other dependencies in mono with qt.  Then create clr bindings to qt. 
> > With these bindings, you could re-write mono using the clr bindings to
> > qt.  Now, that would be interesting.
> >
> > Please note, I am not saying anything is wrong with glib and its
> > dependencies, I just think it would be neat to re-write mono using qt
> > instead of glib.  This way, you could write mono in C++ and have its
> > internals OOP.
> >
> > Changing subject again, I think its good that there are many GUIs you can
> > choose to use on top of mono: qyoto/kimono, asp.net, gtk#, swf, etc...
> >
> > --- On Fri, 2/6/09, pablosantosluac at terra.es <pablosantosluac at terra.es> 
wrote:
> >> From: pablosantosluac at terra.es <pablosantosluac at terra.es>
> >> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Qt anyone?
> >> To: "SE1" <ikruis at gmail.com>
> >> Cc: mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> >> Date: Friday, February 6, 2009, 6:51 AM
> >> Ok, great. The problem is exactly what you mentioned: with
> >> no website
> >> and no info... there's no way developers can get
> >> interested on it.
> >>
> >> SE1 escribió:
> >>> PABLOSANTOSLUAC at terra.es wrote:
> >>>>   Hi there,
> >>>>
> >>>>   After reading:
> >>
> >> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/05/2138228,
> >>
> >>>>   and after the announce of the LGPL Qt release, I
> >>
> >> think it's quite clear
> >>
> >>>>   there's a lot to gain from a *solid* Qt
> >>
> >> binding for Mono.
> >>
> >>>>   I mean, the Qyoto doesn't look like an alive
> >>
> >> project anymore (not at
> >>
> >>>>   least a couple of weeks ago) and if I remember
> >>
> >> correctly it is
> >>
> >>>>   restricted to Linux (true cross-platform is
> >>
> >> needed).
> >>
> >>>>   And... apps! I'd be eager to port plastic
> >>
> >> GUI to Qt/C#, and maybe we
> >>
> >>>>   could start from the Qyoto stuff, but not sure
> >>
> >> about the status.
> >>
> >>>>   pablo
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> >>>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> >>
> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >>
> >>> Someone brought the same questions up recently. If you
> >>
> >> read the thread at
> >>
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Qyoto-project-dead---ts21427284.html
> >> you'll see that
> >>
> >>> although the Qyoto website is down, the project is
> >>
> >> still very much alive. It
> >>
> >>> also works cross-platform, just lacks the building
> >>
> >> support at the moment.
> >>
> >>> Ilmar
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> >> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

-- 
Arno Rehn
arno at arnorehn.de