[Mono-dev] solaris x86

pablosantosluac at terra.es pablosantosluac at terra.es
Fri Feb 6 16:30:35 EST 2009


Well, basically using a Solaris 10 or a OpenSolaris the process is not 
that hard at it used to be. Follow the instructions on the mono website 
and don't forget the magic command

ulimit -Hs 10240

vi /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc -> get rid of the -mt param
 export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH

 export PATH=/opt/csw/gcc3/bin:$PATH
 export CC=gcc
 export MAKE=gmake
 export TAR=gtar
 ulimit -Hs 10240
 alias make=gmake
 export GREP=ggrep
 export SED=gsed
 alias ar=gar



Cetin Sert escribió:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> Thank you very much for the binaries!
>
> Do you have any scripts, guidelines, blog posts etc. about the build 
> process?
>
> Regards,
> Cetin Sert
>
> 2009/2/6 pablosantosluac at terra.es <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es> 
> <pablosantosluac at terra.es <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es>>
>
>     Try
>
>     http://blastwave.network.com/testing/mono-2.0,REV=2009.01.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>     I'll try to build 2.2 over the weekend.
>
>     pablo
>
>     Cetin Sert escribió:
>
>         I'd like to know where these binaries can be downloaded.
>
>         Regards,
>         Cetin Sert
>
>         2009/2/6 pablosantosluac at terra.es
>         <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es>
>         <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es
>         <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es>> <pablosantosluac at terra.es
>         <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es>
>         <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es
>         <mailto:pablosantosluac at terra.es>>>
>
>
>            Hi,
>
>            I've just finished running our internal PNUnit test suite
>         on Open
>            Solaris x86 with hand-compiled Mono 2.2. It works. The same is
>            true for
>            Solaris 10 x86.
>
>            I've published a "test" binary release of Mono 2.0.1 for
>         Solaris
>            x86 in
>            blastwave a few weeks ago. Next one will be 2.2.
>
>            MWF runs on 2.0.1 but (at least on my tests) it was not
>         stable enough.
>
>            Regards,
>
>            pablo
>            _______________________________________________
>            Mono-devel-list mailing list
>            Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>         <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
>            <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>         <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>>
>
>            http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
>


More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list