[Mono-dev] [Fwd: [Mono-patches] r116660 - trunk/mono/data/net_2_0]
grendel at twistedcode.net
Wed Oct 22 12:48:50 EDT 2008
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:44:25 +0900
Atsushi Eno <atsushi at ximian.com> wrote:
> Hey Marek,
> Marek Habersack wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:47:46 +0900
> > Atsushi Eno <atsushi at ximian.com> wrote:
> >> Hi grendel,
> > Hey Atsushi,
> >> How does this break 2.0 apps? They do not exist in .NET, but
> >> they do in our 2.0 profile (lib/mono/2.0).
> > If you have an application which uses System.Web.Extensions 1.0, it will break.
> > The Telerik controls (for 2.0), for instance, failed to compile because the
> > compiler complained about duplicate symbols in the assemblies. .NET leaves the
> > assemblies out for the same reason - to support legacy 2.0 apps painlessly. If
> > you want to make it easier to reference 3.5 libraries in a project, I'd
> > recommend adding a .NET 3.5 rule to mconfig (in the similar fashion AJAX is
> > added). See mcs/tools/mconfig/data/config.xml and
> > http://www.mono-project.com/Howto_Mconfig
> Oh, right. Actually I found an <assemblies> section in my sample
> DynamicData application (that I sent you before). So it must be
> included in every web app instead of having those references in
> our global web.config.
yeah, and modifying mconfig to ease adding that info would be a good thing. Do you
think you could do that?
> Then there should be different problem in our build manager that
> blocks compiling DynamicData sites. Maybe it is insufficient support
> for <pages>/<controls> (there is a configuration element which is
> "<add tagPrefix="asp" namespace="System.Web.DynamicData ...>" in
We support that.
More information about the Mono-devel-list