[Mono-dev] libgdiplus shared lib problem
paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk
Sun Oct 19 06:06:14 EDT 2008
> It should be a symlink so that if .so.0 is replaced with .so.x the
> library name doesn't change just the symlink.
> What is the problem you are having?
It's for part of the packaging for fedora. Currently, to get
mono-winforms to work, libgdiplus-devel (which contains the .so file) is
needed. I'm trying to fix it so that the -devel file isn't needed (and
it's not a case of the .so file being placed in the main package, that
isn't allowed), but that means the .so file is not a symlink.
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20081019/f390807c/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Mono-devel-list